Newcastle Interested In Danny Rose Of Tottenham?

News today that Blackpool and Newcastle are interested in Tottenham midfielder Danny Rose.

Danny Rose – 20 year-old England U21 International

Danny is the young winger who scored that unbelievable goal for Tottenham against Asenal towards the end of last season, and is a top up-and-coming player at the London club.

The news is that Harry Redknapp wants the 20 year old to go out on loan to get more first team experience, and with Chris Hughton good friends with Harry, and so well respected by the Tottenham club, it could well be that Newcastle are in the driver’s seat for the 20 year-old player – if  they want him.

Danny has already been sent out on loan to both Watford and Peterborough last year to help with his football development,and since Newcastle were linked with a loan move for 21 year-old Kyle Naughton yesterday, it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that Chris has discussed both Kyle and Danny with Spurs manager Harry Redknapp.

Of course both Blackpool and Newcastle are also vying for young winger Tom Cleverley of Manchester United, and it’s unlikely both would arrive at Newcastle.

But with the transfer market starting to pick up significantly, there could be some news on loan signings in the near future on Tyneside.

We hope so anyway.

Comments welcome.

25 comments so far

  • RichK

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:08 AM

    Comment #1

    Sky matches just been announced, no surprises that our opener will be screened live, the first Monday night match. Surprised at them showing us against Stoke, and West Ham, but then no surprises with the other three, Sunderland, Arsenal and Chelsea. Bring on the season.

  • NUFC_Richyg01

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:10 AM

    Comment #2

    we are also on ESPN vs. Villa (22nd Aug) and M.City (3rd Oct)

  • Rotonda heights

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:21 AM

    Comment #3

    Can someone please explain the loan rules.

    Are we allowed 4 loans per season, but only 2 at a time, ie we’d have to wait for the first 2 loans to expire before we bought in another 2 or can we have ll 4 all season long if they are not being loaned from the same club ?

  • NUFC_Richyg01

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:23 AM

    Comment #4

    Like Ed says it would be Rose OR Cleverley and to be honest I think the Cleverly deal is already well on its way.

    Besides, we wouldnt be able to take Rose AND Naughton from Spurs, aint you only allowed one player on loan from a team?

  • Newutd

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM

    Comment #5

    None of them will come. I feel it. So, stop the rumour mill about them, guys:)

  • Ericles

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:33 AM

    Comment #6

    My bones are telling me something too Newutd!

  • NUFC_Richyg01

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:40 AM

    Comment #7

    I found this, dunno if its right tho.

    There shall be two categories of temporary loan transfers allowed – Short Term Loans and
    Long Term Loans. The following restrictions shall apply to both types of loan:

    47.3.1 A maximum of 5 loan Players (either Short Term or Long Term) can be named in the
    sixteen Players listed on a team sheet for any individual Match. This figure shall
    include any additional loan of a goalkeeper approved by the Executive under the
    provisions of Regulation 49.

    47.3.2 No more than 4 loan Players (either Short Term or Long Term) may join one Club
    from another Club in any Season.

    A Club can have up to 4 Players on Long Term Loan at any one time during any

    A Club can have up to 8 Players on Short Term Loan during any Season,
    but no more than 4 at any one time.

  • Mags

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:41 AM

    Comment #8

    According to Vital Man U – the Cleverley loan deal is all but done; they say Hughton will wtap up the deal today!!!!!!

  • John

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:43 AM

    Comment #9

    We dnt need this lad, Mcfadden sounds very interesting tink we mite regret not signing boyd tho when he starts banging in goals for boro. the lad Gervinho played up front winger for Ivory coast was electric when he came off the bench for them wudf be great buy for us plays for lillie in france.

  • MacToon

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM

    Comment #10

    4 loans per season, but only 2 at a time.

    That is if you had a 3 month loan ( say up to Christmas) then you could have another when his contact expires (starts in the new year).

    personally I prefer the full season loan, there will be more stability then and feel more like our player instead of thinking , oh he’ll be gone by the time we play this team etc.

    Hate to think we could be a training club for Spurs, man U is one thing but Spurs! lol how times change.

  • Chris F

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM

    Comment #11

    NUFC_Richyg01: not sure that’s up to date, as EPL clubs now have matchday squads of 18.

    Checked and found their rules and regs doc, section M on player registrations has this to say:

    7.5 the maximum number of Temporary Transfers to any one Club registrable in the same
    Season shall be 4 and in no circumstances shall more than 1 be from the same Transferor
    Club save there shall be excluded from these numbers any Temporary Transfer of the
    kind described in Rule M.7.6.1 or M.7.6.2;
    7.6 not more than 2 Temporary Transfers shall be registered by a Club at the same time
    except that there shall be excluded from that number:
    7.6.1 any Temporary Transfer which become permanent; and
    7.6.2 the Temporary Transfer of a goalkeeper which in its absolute discretion the Board
    may allow in circumstances it considers to be exceptional;

    So looks like it’s 2 at a time, max of 4 per season UNLESS a deal is made to make the move permanent at the end of the loan period.

    As i can’t see any of the players we’re linked with actually coming on a loan to buy basis, looks like it’ll be limited to 2.

  • MacToon

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM

    Comment #12

    As far as I’m aware only 1 loan can come from a team at a time too.

    NUFC_Richyg01, not sure where you got that info. from but it doesn’t seem right and certainly not what I’ve read.

  • MacToon

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:51 AM

    Comment #13

    Chris F, yeah that seems right lol.

  • NUFC_Richyg01

    Jul 6, 2010 at 11:54 AM

    Comment #14

    Yeah thats more like it Chris F, cheers.

  • BeeGuy

    Jul 6, 2010 at 12:18 PM

    Comment #15

    With finances the way they are, why bother with loan players? NUFC will pay to develop someone else’s talent, permit the loaning team to keep a larger roster, and that player likely will come back to haunt us. It’s a buyer’s market, and as has been said, the talent available is quality-so why rent when you can own?

  • punk skunk...

    Jul 6, 2010 at 12:19 PM

    Comment #16

    No thanx!..
    …Why train other teams youngsters?..

    …Ball off back to’ broadway Danny Rose’…

    Oh wow!..He scored a goal & now he’s brilliant!..
    …Buy Jamie O’Hara off of them, maybe?..

  • MacToon

    Jul 6, 2010 at 12:24 PM

    Comment #17

    I don’t like the idea of loans but with this owner and the possible lack of transfer money then we won’t have many options. One thing for sure is that the squad does need strengthening.

    £1 mil – £1.25 mil for Perch highlights how little money is available, I hope I’m wrong but ain’t gonna hold my breath.

  • Ericles

    Jul 6, 2010 at 12:28 PM

    Comment #18

    Good summary BeeGuy.

  • punk skunk...

    Jul 6, 2010 at 12:44 PM

    Comment #19

    .5-£1m for Perch…
    That’s what he’s worth with his contract runnin’ down…That’s what it highlights, for me!..

  • Chris F

    Jul 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM

    Comment #20

    don’t see how the Perch fee shows how little is available, just =shows what he was worth in the market, going into the last year of his contract.

    would you rather we’d paid £5mill for him? 😉

  • Sav

    Jul 6, 2010 at 1:39 PM

    Comment #21

    Yes, MacToon, if we had paid MORE for Perch we would have LESS left for transfers now. Its called subtraction….and a good deal.

    Not the other way about, mate.

  • MacToon

    Jul 6, 2010 at 5:20 PM

    Comment #22

    It’s not the point of what we paid for Perch, it just shows the price range of players we are looking at.

    Getting a bit picky on here ehh!

    You’re not trying to tell me he’ll be a Bassong and worth 10X what we paid for him in a years time.

  • Newutd

    Jul 6, 2010 at 6:59 PM

    Comment #23

    Of course it’s a point what we paid for Perch. He isn’t worth 3 mp. THAT would just show we are back on track with overpricing players.

  • RichY

    Jul 6, 2010 at 7:44 PM

    Comment #24

    are there too many loan players coming in???

  • nuttyward

    Jul 6, 2010 at 8:25 PM

    Comment #25

    players will come out of the blue, the thing is with the toon these days our business is kept hush hush till there done , weve learnt the hard way in the past, lets face it we were all a bit shocked in january with the signings even if they wernt big names, weve had them sort of players big egos big wages . trust CH he aint let us down yet


You must log in to post a comment.