Needs Must: 352 Needed To Stem The Tide
Updated: 9 hours ago
"Terrible in defence".
That was Dion Dublin's blunt assessment after watching Newcastle constantly give Aston Villa, and especially their ST Jackson, acres of space to run into when possession was lost ofter a Toon attack.
We've seen it time and again in games this season;
We get plenty of possession in the oppo's half, the 2,3,1 and FB's get forward - but we don't create chances - and when we lose possession one simple ball over the top all too often leaves three or four players bearing down on our two CB's.
If I was a manager of an opponent I'd allow Newcastle to get into our half, wait for most of Newcastle's players to be in our half, and as soon as possession is won hit quick passes through the lines or over the top - and guess what, by tactical planning or in game management, that is exactly how teams are racking up chances and goals.
It can't go on.
Surely Jaissle can see what nearly every fan over the age of ten can;
His 4231 system is a disaster waiting to happen in every game - especially now that every manager in the PL knows it isn't working and now even the media are jumping on the bandwagon.
The First Rule: Don't Concede
With only one clean sheet this season, against Spurs, the fact is Newcastle's porous defence currently means we need to score two goals to win a game - because the oppo are virtually guaranteed to get at least one.
Given that we create so few chances, and in the early games our goal conversion was unsustainable, scoring two goals a game is a mountain that we aren't going to climb often, especially with a team that seems to have forgotten how to shoot.
Possession is of no use if it doesn't convert into goals - and Jaissle's claim that we "controlled" the game for periods aginst Coventry and Villa is a delusion when the total number of shots in both games was just two or three.
If Jaissle continues playing 4231 believing it will somehow 'click' he is IMO walking onto a gang plank that will lead to Newcastle quickly drowning in a sea of goals and defeats.
He needs to change direction now.
The first, second and third priority, every priority, is to shore up the defence, stop gifting space and chances to the oppo, and give us a chance of the clean sheets that we are currently finding it impossible to achieve.
What Is The Answer?
Our current 4231 all too often leaves us with no effective midfield when the oppo attack.
Go back to Eddie's time and Tonali, Bruno and Jo as the midfield three.
That was not only the springboard for attacks but also the first line that had to be breached before the oppo could get at the defence.
Who is in midfield now when the oppo get a quick break or fashion an attack?
Seriously... you tell me.
Nico usually, but not always, hangs back... Steur when he plays in the two is sometimes there... but after that I'm struggling.
Jaissle wants us to be ready for a quick turnover so our ST and wingers, even if they could get a block or tackle in, aren't dropping back to defend - at 10 neither Wissa or Willock are defensive minded - and on Saturday Jo was named alongside Nico in the 2 but was seen more in Villa's half than he was in ours.
So. I'll ask again... who is part of the 'defending as a team' mantra that is the blueprint for stifling the opposition and minimising scoring chances and goals?
Answers on a postcard enclosing £10 to Wor B Quiz Promotions at the usual address.
352 Is My Call
I don't think our CB's are as vulnerable as they have been made out to be.
OK, Botman hasn't returned to his previous form, but in game after game this season they are under huge pressure and often out numbered because of the lack of protection in front of them.
You don't react to a hole in a dam by sticking a finger in it, you plug it solid.
That's why I'd go 352 with these players when fit;
Hornicek
Back Three: Thiaw Burn Botman
Wing Backs: Dedic/Miley Hall
Central Midfield: Steur Nico Jo
Forwards: Osula Pardo/Barnes
That side IMO immediately looks far stronger defensively, but still gives us pace and attacking intent from midfield, especially from Dedic/Miley and Hall.
Up front we've got height, physical presence and pace in Osula and pace and a goal scoring threat from Pardo/Barnes.
For me, 352 gives us five players in addition to the last line with clear defensive responsibilities instead of no more than two in the current 4231 set up.
There is also a far better chance of a first line press with two up front - how the heck is Pardo or Wissa expected to do that on their own?
Also, if we push high with five in the middle, we have a much more effective support for the front two when they press than with two wingers and a 10 in 4231.
However, having said all of that...
352 should give us at least eight players behind the ball when the oppo attack and surely that will close the space and give our CB's the protection they desperately need.
We have to stop being so easy to score against and give ourselves a decent chance of clean sheets.
Doing the same thing and expecting different results is the definition of madness.
And, IMO, it would be madness for Jaissle to continue with 4231.
It isn't and, I believe, won't work with the squad that he has,
It's time for a change...
Or sooner rather than later... it might be the manager that is changed.
On changes: it's about time you got some new T Shirts from just £16.99!
Choose from our range of Toon, Newcastle and Northumberland themed shirts.
They are already getting rave reviews: Toon Stuff Clothing | ToonStuff
Last Post: Time To Call In The Trusted Lieutenants




Do Football Formations Really Matter? Lessons for Newcastle United
If we cant manage it, then we could probably play 4123, which is very close to 433, and not far off 4231. We have a lot of good solid midfielders.
The big question I have is if MJ is wedded to 4-2-3-1, and he thinks we have the squad that can make this work, how do other teams who play this formation fare.
Do you just need elite players to make it work, or is it more nuanced than that. Is it purely a matter of coaching the players so they improve their positional play in and out of possession. I’ve been watching footy for 55 years and can tell if a player is playing well and if the team is functioning well. But I’ll admit I’m not a formation intellectual. For me we pay big bucks to DofF and coaches to get these details right. So Wilson will have…
Football fans are obsessed with formations, in particular the formation which is displayed by media outlets. I mean which phase of play is that formation even meant to represent? as the positions of players constantly change during the match depending on being in or out of possession, and whether they press or not and how they follow, playing rotating etc
This idea that Jaissle simply has to change one set of abstract numbers to another, will somehow miraculously change our 'fortunes' is pretty naive imo
Jaissle has said it himself many times, that static formations mean very little, Howe said similar things, as do many other coaches
Saratoga
On Saturday I sensed that Nico was hacked off as we all were and late on in the game in frustration he went walkabout to chase the ball. Commendable effort, but that left us totally empty and vulnerable in midfield.
However I reckon in a midfield three or four he will really come good and marshall the troops around him in the style of a younger Bruno.