top of page

The Rebuild Dilemma: Will Newcastle Sell Tonali, Livramento and/or Hall?

  • 7 hours ago
  • 3 min read

Just as the dust settles on Anthony Gordon’s £69.3 million move to Barcelona, transfer reports suggest Newcastle United are prepared to "listen to offers" for three of their most valuable assets: Sandro Tonali, Tino Livramento, and Lewis Hall.


Evolution or Revolution?


With financial regulations squeezing the club's spending power, the hierarchy must balance funding Eddie Howe’s squad overhaul against tearing out the team's core.


We saw with Isak's departure how the loss of his pace, unique skill set and dynamic finishing affected Eddie's preferred style of play so, with Gordon already gone, will it be evolution or revolution in the squad revamp this summer?


Will we see one, two, or all three walk out the door? Let’s break down the likelihood.


Scenario 1: We Sell One (The Likely Compromise)

Likelihood: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️


Selling only one of these players is the most realistic route.


While the Gordon sale provided breathing room, further elite reinforcements—like the pursuit of Osasuna winger Victor Munoz—require more capital.


Newcastle have reportedly slapped a £100 million price tag on Sandro Tonali - and possibly more depending on Elliot Anderson's sale fee - amidst supposedly heavy interest from Manchester City, Arsenal, and Manchester United.


If that valuation is met, it may simply be too much money to turn down.


Generating nearly £170m from just Gordon and Tonali would fully fund a right-winger, another striker and a top midfielder, all while keeping our young fullback duo intact.


Joe Willock is also likely to leave bringing in another c£25M that would bring the available transfer pot up to nigh on £200M + what is already in there.


Scenario 2: We Sell Two (The Aggressive Reset)

Likelihood: ⭐️⭐️⭐️


This is where the strategy gets aggressive, and highly risky.


Selling two of this trio would mean four of our top players walking out the door in a 12-month span when you factor in Isak and Gordon.


While it would grant the club and Eddie Howe massive spending power, replacing that much proven, settled Premier League quality in a single window is a big gamble.


Last summer proved big signings don't mean big upgrades to the squad and with the club now looking to sign players from outside of the Prem the gamble becomes even bigger.


It also sends a sobering message to the rest of the squad - a message that had a deflating effect when Isak abandoned the club to seek bigger wages and bigger trophy winning opportunities.


Scenario 3: We Sell All Three (A Capitulation)

Likelihood: ❌


A plan to sell all three is surely not on the agenda.


There is a massive difference between listening to offers and staging a fire sale.


However, the big IF here is - do these three players want away?


Tino has refused to engage in new contract negotiations, Tonali's agent is rumoured to be hawking him around presumably with Sandro's approval, and Hall is rumoured to be unhappy with not being a guaranteed first choice over Burn.


All three players are tied down to secure, long-term contracts running until at least 2028 so, although the club are in a strong position to ask top fees, how will the club react if all three ask to leave?


The Isak saga has left a lingering bruise on the hierarchy, and us fans, and whilst I wouldn't expect any of the three to go on strike there are other ways to force a move.


That's why I believe selling all three wouldn't be a strategy, but a capitulation.


The Verdict: A Line Must Be Drawn


Last summer one of the big mistakes was not understanding that Isak wanted away and that three years left on his contract meant nothing other than we could demand a high fee.


That's why, IMO, all three by now should have been sat down and asked specifically "are you happy to stay, or do you definitely want to go".


Depending on how many of those three, and who, the club are OK with selling the others need to have already been told "we'll decide who leaves, not you or your agent".


No more capitualating to player power as we did with Isak.


The saying that no player is bigger than the club has to be enforced.







 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Bloated World Cup Format Leaves Many Fans Cold

The 2026 FIFA World Cup has officially arrived, but for fans watching from the comfort of home in the UK, many have yet to be infected with the usual WC football fever. The 48-Team Bloat: Diluting the

 
 
 

50 Comments


Unknown member
15 minutes ago

Out of the three, Sandro tino and hall, I’m hoping the club do everything to keep Hall. Tino can go imo, a player we can replace and make a good return on. Sandro is quality but if we can get 100m, it gives us a good return on and money to reinvest. Hall must stay and be someone we build the squad around.

Like

Unknown member
22 minutes ago

Bringing in a new chief scout - what sort of credentials, experience would you expect? Probably a long time working in football and a CV that identified several under-the-radar players that were successful in the PL. Who does this person report to at NUFC? Eddie Howe's 31 yr old nephew who masterminded last summer's transfer window. Oh well, there'll be another job along shorty.

Like

Unknown member
an hour ago

Batman's cape should be renamed Cape Verde

Like

Unknown member
an hour ago

With a bit more calmness on those late breaks Cape Verde might have scored.


What a defensive performance from them though.


Superb.

Like

Unknown member
an hour ago

Get in little Cape Verdy what a fantastic result, delighted for them.

Like
bottom of page